You can submit an answer using the "Questions" e-mail link at the What You Need to Know web site. (Look in the lower, right-hand section of that page.)
If you submit the earliest best answer, I'll post your answer (without your name) and a critique here. It will be in the "Comments" section for that question.
Here's Question No. 16 (It's a Short-Answer Concepts question.):
Political scientists endeavor to maintain an empirical point of view when comparing political systems.
What are two reasons that is an important endeavor for political scientists?
If political scientists used normative analyses when comparing political systems, what is one way you would expect the results of their comparisons to be different from when they used empirical analyses? (4 point question)
(See pp. 25-27, 37, and 39 in What You Need to Know.)
Monday, April 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment